Bug 479427 - General protection fault on shutdown (kernel-2.6.29-0.19.rc0.git9.fc11.x86_64)
Summary: General protection fault on shutdown (kernel-2.6.29-0.19.rc0.git9.fc11.x86_64)
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: kernel
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kernel Maintainer List
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-01-09 14:57 UTC by Tom London
Modified: 2009-01-15 17:30 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-01-15 17:30:24 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Picture of screen with GPF on shutdown (218.68 KB, image/jpeg)
2009-01-09 14:57 UTC, Tom London
no flags Details
Picture of screen with GPF on shutdown (229.91 KB, image/jpeg)
2009-01-09 15:10 UTC, Tom London
no flags Details

Description Tom London 2009-01-09 14:57:39 UTC
Created attachment 328553 [details]
Picture of screen with GPF on shutdown

Description of problem:
I regularly get a General Protection Fault on shutdown (followed by a hang).

Attach a picture of the screen with the errors.

RIP says __stop_machine

Call trace (to my best ability):

_cpu_down
disable_nonboot_cpus
kernel_power_off
sys_reboot
.....

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
kernel-2.6.29-0.19.rc0.git9.fc11.x86_64

How reproducible:
Very frequent.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Tom London 2009-01-09 15:10:48 UTC
Created attachment 328556 [details]
Picture of screen with GPF on shutdown

this picture really is for kernel-2.6.29-0.19.rc0.git9.fc11.x86_64.

[Previous attachment was for kernel-2.6.29-0.18.rc0.git9.fc11.x86_64]

Comment 2 Christopher Beland 2009-01-12 08:06:52 UTC
I experienced a similar problem, which seems to be fixed in kernel-2.6.29-0.25.rc0.git14.fc11.x86_64.

Comment 3 Tom London 2009-01-12 14:25:26 UTC
I haven't seen this since 0.25, and it has not reappeared so far with 0.29.

I'll monitor for a few days and close if it does not occur.....


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.