Description of problem: We have two spacewalk-backend-* packages that conflict with specpo. There seems to have been some problem with specspo in the past but the details are fuzzy. We should not conflict with specspo, and if having specspo causes us problems, we should get specspo fixed, or run our code with LANG=C, or something to that effect. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): # rpm -q spacewalk-backend-app spacewalk-backend-xp spacewalk-backend-app-0.4.10-1.el5 spacewalk-backend-xp-0.4.10-1.el5 How reproducible: Deterministic. Steps to Reproduce: 1. # rpm -q --conflicts spacewalk-backend-app spacewalk-backend-xp Actual results: specspo specspo and Spacewalk works. Expected results: No conflicts (no conflicts with specspo), specspo installed, and Spacewalk works. Additional info: The discussion took place on mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-devel/2009-January/msg00040.html
The Conflict was removed from .spec, in commit d0846e3510b8ca26a15cf499a5921c2326807253.
FAILQA till the issue in BZ 480127 is resolved.
temporary workaround: rpm -e specspo
We seem to have the conflict removed both from Spacewalk and Satellite packages: [root@xen90 ~]# rpm -q spacewalk-backend-app spacewalk-backend-xp spacewalk-backend-app-0.7.5-1.el5.noarch spacewalk-backend-xp-0.7.5-1.el5.noarch [root@xen90 ~]# rpm -q --conflicts spacewalk-backend-app spacewalk-backend-xp (none)(none)[root@xen90 ~]# [root@sputnik-prod ~]# rpm -q spacewalk-backend-app spacewalk-backend-xp spacewalk-backend-app-0.5.28-34.el5sat spacewalk-backend-xp-0.5.28-34.el5sat [root@sputnik-prod ~]# rpm -q --conflicts spacewalk-backend-app spacewalk-backend-xp (none)(none)[root@sputnik-prod ~]# As such, moving to VERIFIED.
Spacewalk 0.7 released.