Bug 479763 - Review Request: seam - The Simple Extensible Abstract Machine
Summary: Review Request: seam - The Simple Extensible Abstract Machine
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-01-12 22:04 UTC by Fabian Affolter
Modified: 2010-01-26 00:03 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-11-14 14:54:04 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Fabian Affolter 2009-01-12 22:04:43 UTC
Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/seam.spec
SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/seam-1.4-1.fc9.src.rpm

Project URL: http://www.ps.uni-sb.de/seam/

Description:
SEAM (Simple Extensible Abstract Machine) is a virtual machine
architecture and library. SEAM is designed to be language- and
platform-independent, to be simple and based on few principled
services.

* Uniform data representation and memory management
* Platform-independent external representation
* Abstract execution model

Koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1047921

rpmlint output:
[fab@laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint seam*
seam.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libseam.so.0.0.0 exit
seam-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

[fab@laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint seam-1.4-1.fc9.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

At the moment this package is not building in 64-bit environments. ->  ExclusiveArch:  %{ix86} ppc

I guess it's around the GNU Lightning support.

Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 07:30:01 UTC
It's getting less and less useful to have an i386-only package; I don't even try building anything on i386 these days.  Is there no chance of getting this to work on x86_64 or any other 64-bit architecture?

Comment 2 Fabian Affolter 2009-08-03 13:39:08 UTC
I will take a new look.

Comment 3 Fabian Affolter 2009-11-14 14:54:04 UTC
Upstream doesn't seam to be active any more.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.