Bug 479763 - Review Request: seam - The Simple Extensible Abstract Machine
Review Request: seam - The Simple Extensible Abstract Machine
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2009-01-12 17:04 EST by Fabian Affolter
Modified: 2010-01-25 19:03 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-11-14 09:54:04 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Fabian Affolter 2009-01-12 17:04:43 EST
Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/seam.spec
SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/seam-1.4-1.fc9.src.rpm

Project URL: http://www.ps.uni-sb.de/seam/

Description:
SEAM (Simple Extensible Abstract Machine) is a virtual machine
architecture and library. SEAM is designed to be language- and
platform-independent, to be simple and based on few principled
services.

* Uniform data representation and memory management
* Platform-independent external representation
* Abstract execution model

Koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1047921

rpmlint output:
[fab@laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint seam*
seam.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libseam.so.0.0.0 exit@GLIBC_2.0
seam-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

[fab@laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint seam-1.4-1.fc9.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

At the moment this package is not building in 64-bit environments. ->  ExclusiveArch:  %{ix86} ppc

I guess it's around the GNU Lightning support.
Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 03:30:01 EDT
It's getting less and less useful to have an i386-only package; I don't even try building anything on i386 these days.  Is there no chance of getting this to work on x86_64 or any other 64-bit architecture?
Comment 2 Fabian Affolter 2009-08-03 09:39:08 EDT
I will take a new look.
Comment 3 Fabian Affolter 2009-11-14 09:54:04 EST
Upstream doesn't seam to be active any more.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.