RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 479863 - Use SHA-2 in RPM signatures
Summary: Use SHA-2 in RPM signatures
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: distribution
Version: 6.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: 6.0
Assignee: RHEL Program Management
QA Contact: Daniel Riek
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 479859
Blocks: 477043
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-01-13 17:08 UTC by Miloslav Trmač
Modified: 2013-01-10 05:00 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 479859
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-05-29 19:07:47 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Miloslav Trmač 2009-01-13 17:08:23 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #479859 +++

RPMs are currently signed using a DSA key and a SHA-1 message digest.  SHA-1 has known weaknesses, we should migrate to signatures that use a SHA-2 hash.

See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/StrongerHashes for more detailed rationale.

RPM currently supports SHA-2 only with RSA keys.  The key size should be at least 2048 bits, which [1] claims achieves algorithm strength of 112 bits (with SHA-256 strength of 128 bits, the result is the smaller value, i.e. 112 bits).

So, the RHEL6 key should be a RSA key with key size at least 2048 bits.  (This means the key needs to be different from the key used to sign RHEL 5!)

To use SHA-256 with the key, define the following macro:
--define '__gpg_sign_cmd %{__gpg} gpg --force-v3-sigs --digest-algo sha256 --batch --no-verbose --no-armor --passphrase-fd 3 --no-secmem-warning -u "%{_gpg_name}" -sbo %{__signature_filename} %{__plaintext_filename}'

(--force-v3 sigs is necessary due to #436812).

This creates RPMs that can be handled by rpm at least since RHEL5 (rpm-4.4.2), but not by the RHEL4 rpm (4.3.3).

[1] http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-57/sp800-57-Part1-revised2_Mar08-2007.pdf


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.