Apparently the new version of libuninameslist, 20080409, supports Unicode 5.1, which is quite useful for me, since the list is used in fontforge to display names for glyphs... I can try to update the package myself. I just asked for commit access.
Sounds good... in rawhide feel free. For F-10 we should discuss and do at the same time as fontforge...
Thanks. I was thinking of updating the versioning scheme of libuninameslist to reflect that of fontforge too: upstream is the same guy, he uses 8-digit dates for both, but we are using 0.0-8.20080409 for libuninameslist vs 20081215-2.fc11 for for fontforge. May I change the versioning scheme too?
I would think that would work fine... 20080409-1 is newer than 0.0-8.20080409, so there shouldnt be a problem. the 0.0 thing seems like the package was being treated as a prerelease or postrelease package, but in fact the date is the release version. ;)
Update built for rawhide. For F-10, I'll wait until we figure out what to do with fontforge.
Should we rebuild fontforge against this version as well (in rawhide), and/or possibly update fontforge to the newest upstream (in rawhide)? I guess we can discuss on the fonts list and/or irc...