Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/rednotebook.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/rednotebook-0.5.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://digitaldump.wordpress.com/projects/rednotebook/ Description: RedNotebook is a desktop diary that makes it very easy for you to keep track of the stuff you do and the thoughts you have. This journal software helps you to write whole passages or just facts, and does so in style. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1079749 rpmlint output: [fab@laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint rednotebook* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab@laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint rednotebook-0.5.1-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
On my machines this application is crashing... [fab@laptop24 ~]$ rednotebook AppDir: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/rednotebook BaseDir: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages 7955ed6d-4298-8816-362d144d-0b45e79e is dumped I will get in touch with upstream about this.
It's a known bug -> https://bugs.launchpad.net/rednotebook/+bug/320492
A person reports that it works with the workaround from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439667#c8
* Thu Feb 12 2009 Fabian Affolter <fabian> - 0.5.5-1 - Updated to new upstream version 0.5.5 Updated files Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/rednotebook.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/rednotebook-0.5.5-1.fc10.src.rpm
* Sat Mar 07 2009 Fabian Affolter <fabian> - 0.6.1-1 - Updated to new upstream version 0.6.1 - Renamed docs, added License file Updated files Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/rednotebook.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/rednotebook-0.6.1-1.fc10.src.rpm
Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of source file: f7517ef745e1f1fc0575c38ed24b95c4c3538904 rednotebook-0.6.1.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 + koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the test passes. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================
Manuel, thanks for the review.
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rednotebook Short Description: A desktop diary Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC:
cvs done.
rednotebook-0.6.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rednotebook-0.6.1-1.fc9
rednotebook-0.6.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rednotebook-0.6.1-1.fc10
The package still crashes on x86_64 because MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME/LD_LIBRARY_PATH are != /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9. That's why upstream added rednotebook/files/default.cfg for packagers to customize that path. As a downside, this package can no longer be noarch. I suggest to - ether make the package arch-depended temporary or - disable gtkmozembed for a while (useGTKMozembed=1) The next version of the package will check for the location of xulrunner on startup. Please read http://www.gnomefiles.org/comment.php?soft_id=2450 for details.
You are buildrequiring desktop-file-utils, but you are not using them to install or validate the desktop file. When using desktop-file install, please "add-category="GTK;GNOME;Calendar;" in order to allow nested menus. Please use versioned (Build)Requires as the versions needed are pretty up to date and prefent the package from being build on EPEL etc.: python-devel >= 2.5 pygtk2-devel >= 2.13 PyYAML >= 3.05 gnome-python2-gtkhtml2 >= 2.19.1
rednotebook-0.6.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update rednotebook'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-2576
rednotebook-0.6.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rednotebook'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-2602
rednotebook-0.6.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rednotebook-0.6.2-1.fc10
rednotebook-0.6.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rednotebook-0.6.2-1.fc9
rednotebook-0.6.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rednotebook'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-2892
rednotebook-0.6.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update rednotebook'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-2960
rednotebook-0.6.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
rednotebook-0.6.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
FYI: 0.6.3 which fixes the bug I mentioned was released last weekend.
Thanks
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rednotebook New Branches: el6 Owners: fab InitialCC:
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rednotebook New Branches: epel7 Upstream URL: Owners: fab InitialCC: