Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

For bugs related to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 product line. The current stable release is 5.10. For Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and above, please visit Red Hat JIRA https://issues.redhat.com/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa?pid=12332745 to report new issues.

Bug 481628

Summary:	AVCs for system_dbusd_t -> [ hal_t, unconfined_t
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5	Reporter:	Colin Walters <walters>
Component:	selinux-policy	Assignee:	Daniel Walsh <dwalsh>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	BaseOS QE <qe-baseos-auto>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	5.3	CC:	mmalik, ohudlick
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-09-02 07:59:25 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Colin Walters 2009-01-26 19:57:52 UTC

Looks like we need at least:

allow system_dbusd_t hald_t:dbus send_msg;

allow system_dbusd_t unconfined_t:dbus send_msg;

According to dwalsh these are in Fedora, but not EL5.

In general the send_msg permission should be used bidirectionally with the bus; it's not very useful to be able to send a message but not get a reply.

Comment 1 Daniel Walsh 2009-01-26 20:00:23 UTC

Fixed in selinux-policy-2.4.6-205.el5

Comment 6 Daniel Walsh 2009-04-08 15:43:34 UTC

No I think this is a bug.

I will add

Fixed in selinux-policy-2.4.6-222.el5

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2009-09-02 07:59:25 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1242.html