Bug 483727 - Review Request: touchcal - Calibration utility for touch screens
Summary: Review Request: touchcal - Calibration utility for touch screens
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Fabian Affolter
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-02-03 11:30 UTC by Dan Horák
Modified: 2009-03-09 18:52 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-03-09 18:52:05 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
mail: fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Dan Horák 2009-02-03 11:30:41 UTC
Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/touchcal.spec
SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/touchcal-0.31-1.fc11.src.rpm

Description:
touchcal is a tool to calibrate touch screens with serial controllers from the
manufacturers EloGraphics (IntelliTouch E281-2310) and MicroTouch (SMT3
serial) for use under Xorg.

Comment 1 Fabian Affolter 2009-03-08 16:16:05 UTC
Package Review
==============

Package: 

Key:
 - = N/A
 x = Check
 ! = Problem
 ? = Not evaluated

=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
 [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
 [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec.
 [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines
 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one
supported architecture.
     Tested on: F10/i386
 [x] Rpmlint output:
     Source RPM:
     [fab@laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint touchcal-0.31-1.fc11.src.rpm 
     1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
     Binary RPM(s):
     [fab@laptop24 i386]$ rpmlint -i touchcal*
     2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
 [x] Package is not relocatable.
 [x] Buildroot is correct
     master   : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
     spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     License type: GPLv2+
 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc.

 [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
 [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
     Upstream source: 253032b585254056e19c56827ed9f539
     Build source:    253032b585254056e19c56827ed9f539
 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
 [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [-] The spec file handles locales properly.  %find_lang used for locales.
 [x] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured.
 [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
 [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
 [x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
 [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
 [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
 [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section.
 [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
 [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
 [x] Package consistently uses macros.
 [x] Package contains code, or permissable content.

 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
 [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present.
 [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
 [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
 [x] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete.
 [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application.

=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
 [?] Timestamps preserved with cp and install.
 [x] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags})
 [x] Latest version is packaged.
 [-] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
 [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
 [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
     Tested on: F10/i386
 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported
architectures.
     Tested:  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1229748
 [x] Package functions as described.
     Only tested if the app started.  I have no hardware to test.
 [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
 [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
 [-] File based requires are sane.
 [x] Changelog in allowed format

I see no further blocker, package APPROVED

Comment 2 Dan Horák 2009-03-08 16:34:54 UTC
New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: touchcal
Short Description: Calibration utility for touch screens
Owners: sharkcz
Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-4 EL-5

Comment 3 Dan Horák 2009-03-08 16:46:24 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> Package Review
> ==============
> I see no further blocker, package APPROVED  

Thanks for the review.

Comment 4 Kevin Fenzi 2009-03-09 15:58:44 UTC
cvs done.

Comment 5 Dan Horák 2009-03-09 18:52:05 UTC
imported and built


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.