Description of problem: Conga (luci-0.12.1-7.el5) is displaying incorrect information for a Virtual Machine as a service under the "Run exclusive" check box. If I un-check the box, and update, the box is still checked. Cluster.conf shows exclusive="0" for the VM service, so it conflicts with what is being shown. If you un-check then check the box, and update, cluster.conf shows exclusive="1" so the functionality of the button is working. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. add a VM as a service 2. observe the VM properties for run exclusive 3. check box is always checked despite what cluster.conf says Actual results: run exclusive is always checked Expected results: run exclusive properly reflects cluster.conf Additional info:
I'm happy to test patches if you want to throw them over the wall.
This has been introduced as part of 5.3, so it is a regression. It is quite nasty in production environments.
~~ Attention - RHEL 5.4 Beta Released! ~~ RHEL 5.4 Beta has been released! There should be a fix present in the Beta release that addresses this particular request. Please test and report back results here, at your earliest convenience. RHEL 5.4 General Availability release is just around the corner! If you encounter any issues while testing Beta, please describe the issues you have encountered and set the bug into NEED_INFO. If you encounter new issues, please clone this bug to open a new issue and request it be reviewed for inclusion in RHEL 5.4 or a later update, if it is not of urgent severity. Please do not flip the bug status to VERIFIED. Only post your verification results, and if available, update Verified field with the appropriate value. Questions can be posted to this bug or your customer or partner representative.
fix verified in luci-0.12.2-6.el5, cluster.conf and GUI are synchronized properly.
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1381.html