Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 484042
Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts
Last modified: 2009-02-18 21:19:01 EST
Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/vlgothic-fonts/vlgothic-fonts.spec
SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/vlgothic-fonts/vlgothic-fonts-20090204-1.fc10.src.rpm
VLGothic provides Japanese TrueType fonts from the Vine Linux project.
Most of the glyphs are taken from the M+ and Sazanami Gothic fonts,
but some have also been improved by the project.
This package will replaces VLGothic-fonts package during the package renaming transition because of applying new font packaging policy.
I'd have used vl-gothic not vlgothic but your choice is ok too.
Upgrade paths work and the package looks sane.
(catalogue is probably leftover cruft since you don't use it, and checking the package is ok would be easier if you used the same line order as the template, but that does not change the result)
☾☾☾ APPROVED ☾☾☾
Please do not forget to update comps
Thank you for review.
New Package CVS Request
Package Name: vlgothic-fonts
Short Description: Japanese TrueType fonts
Branches: devel F-10 F-9
InitialCC: fonts-sig i18n-team
Thanks. packages has been built.
BTW I don't see lowercase name in bugzilla though, is it intentional or?
I've renamed the VLGothic-fonts entry in bugzilla to vlgothic-fonts. It's not possible in bugzilla to have two components that only differ in case so hopefully this is fine.
Thanks. but strangely I don't see either of them at the component list at search page only. though it's available at the combo box on show_bug.cgi and submit-bug page.
Did you hit the "Refresh Components/Versions/Milestones" button ?
You have to do that anytime you change between redhat and fedora components.
I see the lowercase one here in that list.
Ah, thanks. I wasn't aware of that. yes, it works fine after hitting a button.
forgot to get back the flag to avoid a confusion..