Bug 485645 - Virtual folders have problems with Unread messages in F10 version
Virtual folders have problems with Unread messages in F10 version
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: evolution (Show other bugs)
x86_64 Linux
low Severity high
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Matthew Barnes
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2009-02-15 15:37 EST by Joshua Rosen
Modified: 2009-02-15 17:39 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2009-02-15 17:39:26 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
GNOME Desktop 563947 None None None Never

  None (edit)
Description Joshua Rosen 2009-02-15 15:37:34 EST
Description of problem:
In the F10 version the virtual folders feature doesn't work reliably. Here are a few examples,

The Unread mail folder will indicate that there are unread messages but when you look in the folder there is nothing in it.

Other virtual folders will indicate that there are unread message (as indicated by the Bold title and an unread message error count), but if you look in the folder there will be no new messages.

When you convert a database from and older version of Evolution it will indicated that there are thousands of unread messages in the various virtual folders.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):2.24.3

How reproducible: 100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Just keep Evolution open and wait for new mail
Actual results: Sometimes the messages appear in the Unread folders and sometimes they don't.  Exiting and restarting Evolution will usually fix the problems.

Expected results:

Additional info: This is an F10 problem only, the version on F9 doesn't have this issue although the F9 version crashes on occasion.
Comment 1 Matthew Barnes 2009-02-15 17:39:26 EST

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.