First notes :
- It requires PEAR >= 1.7.2 (according to upstream and to xml) : this will block this package for EPEL.

- rpmlint warning :
W: summary-not-capitalized quick two-way blowfish encryption

- %file must be fixed
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%{pear_xmldir}/%{pear_name}.xml
%{pear_testdir}/%{pear_name}
%{pear_phpdir}/Crypt

- I would prefer using %{name}.xml rather than %{pear_name}.xml (see recently approved PHP Guidelines, this is usefull to avoid conflict between package from various channel)

- a comment about running the tests (which must be done as root after install) will be usefull :
=> pear run-tests -p Crypt_Blowfish

Shouldn't this be renamed to php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish to meet Fedora package naming guidelines?

Yes Christopher, you're right, I've miss this error (but it's only first notes ;) not the formal review).

Renamed and updated to follow suggestions :
Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish-1.1.0-0.2.rc2.fc10.src.rpm

You should remove (probably a paste error, already defined above)
----------------------------
BuildRequires: php-pear(PEAR)
Requires: php-pear(PEAR)
Requires(post): %{__pear}
Requires(postun): %{__pear}
Provides:     php-pear(foo) = %{version}
----------------------------

REVIEW:

+ rpmlint is ok
php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish.src: I: checking
php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish.noarch: I: checking
php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish.noarch: W: no-documentation
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
+ package name
+ spec file name 
+ package meet the PHP Guidelines 
+ License ok : BSD
+ License is upstream 
+ spec in english and legible
+ no license file in sources
+ sources match the upstream sources
09f0e38a4d524ba4102db5d11b07ffe9  Crypt_Blowfish-1.1.0RC2.tgz
+ Source URL ok
+ build / run on F10.x86_64
+ BuildRequires (php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2) ok
+ no locale
+ no .so
+ own all directories that it creates
+ no duplicate file
+ %defattr ok
+ %clean section
+ use macros consistently
+ contain code
+ no documentation
+ no devel
+ no pkgconfig
+ no sub-package
+ no GUI
+ don't own files or directories already owned by other packages
+ %install start with rm -rf 
+ valid UTF-8
+ build in mock (fedora-rawhide-x86_64)
+ test suite ok (2 PASSED TESTS)
+ scriptlets ok
- Final Requires ok, but see previous comments
- Final Provides ko, see previous comments
php-pear(foo) = 1.1.0

Just fix the previous comment and I will approve this package.

Thanks for the review, Remi. This is indeed a cut and paste error...

Fixed version :
Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish-1.1.0-0.3.rc2.fc10.src.rpm

+ Requires
php-pear(PEAR)

+ Provides
php-pear(Crypt_Blowfish) = 1.1.0
php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish = 1.1.0-0.3.rc2.fc8

APPROVED

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish
Short Description: Quick two-way blowfish encryption
Owners: xavierb
Branches: F-9 F-10
InitialCC:

cvs done.

php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish-1.1.0-0.3.rc2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish-1.1.0-0.3.rc2.fc10

Imported and built for F-10 and devel.
Doesn't build on F-9 because php-pear version is too old (available 1.7.1, required 1.7.2)

php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish-1.1.0-0.3.rc2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Remi, the earlier 1.1.0 rc1 or 1.0.1 versions don't have a require on pear >= 1.7.2, this would allow to build for F9 and EL5. Would you object if I build either version ?

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish
New Branches: EL-5
Owners: xavierb

cvs done.