Bug 487856 - Review Request: perl-Data-FormValidator - Validates user input (usually from an HTML form) based on input profile
Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-FormValidator - Validates user input (usually from ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: manuel wolfshant
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-02-28 11:32 UTC by Iain Arnell
Modified: 2009-03-18 19:12 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 4.63-1.fc10
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-03-01 05:14:26 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
manuel.wolfshant: fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Iain Arnell 2009-02-28 11:32:28 UTC
Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Data-FormValidator.spec
SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Data-FormValidator-4.63-1.fc11.src.rpm
Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1208361
Description: 
Data::FormValidator's main aim is to make input validation expressible in a
simple format.

Comment 1 manuel wolfshant 2009-02-28 12:35:13 UTC
Package Review
==============

Key:
 - = N/A
 x = Check
 ! = Problem
 ? = Not evaluated

=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
 [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
 [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec.
 [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items
 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture.
     Tested on: devel/x86_64
 [x] Rpmlint output:
source RPM: empty
binary RPM:empty
 [x] Package is not relocatable.
 [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
 [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl)
 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
 [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
 [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL.
     SHA1SUM of source file: d401db7573da545a67368772589fc11cd9aa6002 Data-FormValidator-4.63.tar.gz
 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
 [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [-] The spec file handles locales properly.
 [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
 [x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
 [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
 [x] Permissions on files are set properly.
 [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
 [x] Package consistently uses macros.
 [x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
 [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
 [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
 [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
 [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
 [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application.
 [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.

=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
 [x] Latest version is packaged.
 [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
 [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
 [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
     Tested on: koji scratch build
 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures.
     Tested on: koji scratch build
 [?] Package functions as described.
 [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
 [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
 [-] File based requires are sane.
 [x] %check is present and the tests pass.

===Notes===
I'd say you can ditch the "BuildRequires:  perl >= 0:5.008". It's satisfied by all distributions built this century. Even Fedora Core 1 was using perl 5.8.1


================
*** APPROVED ***
================

Comment 2 Iain Arnell 2009-02-28 18:25:09 UTC
New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: perl-Data-FormValidator
Short Description: Validates user input based on input profile
Owners: iarnell
Branches: F-9 F-10
InitialCC: perl-sig

Comment 3 Kevin Fenzi 2009-03-01 00:17:59 UTC
cvs done.

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2009-03-01 05:13:40 UTC
perl-Data-FormValidator-4.63-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Data-FormValidator-4.63-1.fc10

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2009-03-01 05:13:45 UTC
perl-Data-FormValidator-4.63-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Data-FormValidator-4.63-1.fc9

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2009-03-18 19:07:24 UTC
perl-Data-FormValidator-4.63-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2009-03-18 19:12:28 UTC
perl-Data-FormValidator-4.63-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.