Bug 488463 - evolution: depends on redhat-artwork, but this dependency not mentioned in the *.spec file
Summary: evolution: depends on redhat-artwork, but this dependency not mentioned in th...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3
Classification: Red Hat
Component: evolution
Version: 3.9
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Matthew Barnes
QA Contact: desktop-bugs@redhat.com
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-03-04 13:55 UTC by Jan Lieskovsky
Modified: 2009-03-04 15:48 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-03-04 15:48:51 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jan Lieskovsky 2009-03-04 13:55:37 UTC
Description of problem:

1, file /usr/share/applications/redhat-email.desktop 
/usr/share/applications/redhat-email.desktop: symbolic link to /usr/share/desktop-menu-patches/redhat-email.desktop

2, vi /usr/share/desktop-menu-patches/redhat-email.desktop

     40 Exec=evolution
     41 Icon=redhat-email.png

3, rpm -ql evolution | grep redhat-email.png | wc -l
 0

4,  rpm -qf /usr/share/pixmaps/redhat-email.png 
redhat-artwork-0.73.3-2E.i386

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
evolution-1.4.5-23.el3.*

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. See Description
  
Actual results:
Running nautilus in /usr/share/desktop-menu-patches/ works because
redhat-artwork is already installed.

Expected results:
redhat-artwork dependency should be mentioned in evolution's spec file.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Matthew Barnes 2009-03-04 14:58:42 UTC
Unless you want me to slip this into a security update, it's too late to fix.

Comment 2 Matthew Barnes 2009-03-04 15:32:48 UTC
I should've read your email first.  So this comes from an rpmdiff warning.

  https://errata.devel.redhat.com/rpmdiff/show/36984.?result_id=349360

It's not worth seeking PM approval flags for this.  I'll just fix it as part of the security update, since it's a trivial one-line change to the package spec.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.