Bug 488681 – Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein

Bug 488681 - Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein

Summary:	Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 480724

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	Package Review (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	low Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:	http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdns/djbdns-1...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2009-03-05 02:12 EST by pjp
Modified:	2009-03-05 07:34 EST (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-03-05 06:52:16 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description pjp 2009-03-05 02:12:22 EST

`djbdns' is a Domain Name System originally written by the eminent author of
qmail, Dr D. J. Bernstein. 

This *new* version 1.05.1 of djbdns is a complete makeover to the original source(djbdns-1.05) and is meant to make life a lot more pleasant. The notable changes so far are in the set-up & configuration steps and integration with the `/sbin/service' framework. This new release is free from the clutches of `daemontools'.

SPEC: http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdns/djbdns.spec
SORC: http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdns/djbdns-1.05.1.tar.gz
SRPM: http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdns/djbdns-1.05.1-1.fc10.src.rpm


References:
  - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724
  - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727

Comment 1 Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-03-05 06:52:16 EST


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 480724 ***

Comment 2 pjp 2009-03-05 07:34:11 EST

   Hey hi,

(In reply to comment #1)
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 480724 ***

  Why is it closed? I would say rather close 480724 and let this be new.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.