This service will be undergoing maintenance at 00:00 UTC, 2016-08-01. It is expected to last about 1 hours
Bug 488681 - Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein
Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 480724
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdns/djbdns-1...
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2009-03-05 02:12 EST by pjp
Modified: 2009-03-05 07:34 EST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-03-05 06:52:16 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description pjp 2009-03-05 02:12:22 EST
`djbdns' is a Domain Name System originally written by the eminent author of
qmail, Dr D. J. Bernstein. 

This *new* version 1.05.1 of djbdns is a complete makeover to the original source(djbdns-1.05) and is meant to make life a lot more pleasant. The notable changes so far are in the set-up & configuration steps and integration with the `/sbin/service' framework. This new release is free from the clutches of `daemontools'.

SPEC: http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdns/djbdns.spec
SORC: http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdns/djbdns-1.05.1.tar.gz
SRPM: http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdns/djbdns-1.05.1-1.fc10.src.rpm


References:
  - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724
  - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727
Comment 1 Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-03-05 06:52:16 EST

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 480724 ***
Comment 2 pjp 2009-03-05 07:34:11 EST
   Hey hi,

(In reply to comment #1)
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 480724 ***

  Why is it closed? I would say rather close 480724 and let this be new.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.