I'm trying to apply patch to the SRPMS over at bug http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12560 So that I can fix a problem with a game that I'm playing. The patch is not official so I'm not making a feature request. Unless of course you are reasonably certain that the patch will do no harm. Be that as it may, details for the patch attached to the bug report for 1.1.14 is located at http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12560 When I try to rebuild the SRPM I get: rpmbuild -ba wine.spec error: Architecture is excluded: x86_64
Oh. I forgot to mention that I'm trying to rebuild wine-1.1.14-1.fc10
Smae problem with wine 1.1.15
OK... I finally learned how to deal with mock and I was able to build wine. And, I successfully built 1.1.18. The reason that I went this route was because of a newly developed patch that improves S3TC support under wine instead of disabling it. It seems to do the job required. The wine.spec had to be modified in order to deal with the changes in 1.1.18 and I will be attaching the modified spec file along with the patch. I suspect that it would be best that you review my changes to confirm that the meet guidelines and of course your expectations. One other thing to note about the spec is that I had to include support for winemp3 as I do not know how to remove it. In any case I will leave the rest in your more than capable hands. Oh.. Please confirm that this would be the correct way to build wine on an x86_64 platform mock rebuild -r fedora-10-i386 ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/wine-1.1.18-1.fc10.src.rpm Thanks for your attention in this matter.
Created attachment 337459 [details] spec for wine 1.1.18
Created attachment 337462 [details] Patch to Improve S3TC support under wine I forgot to mention that the patch was developed under 1.1.18 and the original posting of the patch can be found at http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12560#c86 Again... Thanks
Yippee... Success.... Not only compiled but fully built the rpms under mock including the new patch. Info at bugzilla.redhat.com is updated. Updated Nvidia about progress. Going to test with 180.44 drivers from Nvidia (latest) I will let everyone know how that works.
Sorry that was meant for winehq. If possible could you delete this comment and comment #6
This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 10. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '10'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Fedora 10 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-12-17. Fedora 10 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.