Bug 490434 - [5.3] The nanosleep() syscall sleeps one second longer.
Summary: [5.3] The nanosleep() syscall sleeps one second longer.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kernel
Version: 5.3
Hardware: ia64
OS: Linux
urgent
urgent
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jiri Pirko
QA Contact: Red Hat Kernel QE team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 485323
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-03-16 12:46 UTC by RHEL Program Management
Modified: 2015-05-05 01:16 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-05-07 10:54:12 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2009:0473 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: kernel security and bug fix update 2009-05-07 10:53:11 UTC

Description RHEL Program Management 2009-03-16 12:46:32 UTC 
This bug has been copied from bug #485323 and has been proposed
to be backported to 5.3 z-stream (EUS).
Comment 3 Jiri Pirko 2009-04-08 10:24:51 UTC 
in kernel-2.6.18-128.1.7.el5

you can download RPMs of recent 5.3.z kernels from
http://people.redhat.com/jpirko/.el53z/
Comment 6 Zhang Kexin 2009-04-27 02:53:48 UTC 
comment in #5 is wrong, should be:
bug is verified by running test case in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485323#c1
Comment 8 Jiri Pirko 2009-04-27 09:42:24 UTC 
This bz addresses ia64 arch. There's not mentioned anything about
x86. I think that this suppose to be taken as a separate issue and a new bz
should be opened for this (x86 arch). Thanks
Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2009-05-07 10:54:12 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0473.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.