Spec URL: http://www.bojanpopovic.com/testing/hedgewars.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bojanpopovic.com/testing/hedgewars-0.9.9-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The latest official release of Hegdewars. Based on already existing 0.9.7 spec file. This is my first package and I'm looking for a sponsor.
Hi, this is just a very fast and informal review. - it seems that hedgewars is already and still maintained in Fedora (whilst, in the guildelines, is said "you should make sure that it is a new package"): update to 0.9.9 upstream is already on cvs for f11 - anyway, there's 1 rpmlint warning: hedgewars.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 81)
Thanx you Alex. I'll check the warning and try to contact the current maintainer. Is tere any possibilty on getting this accepted as a backport then? 0.9.10 is due to be released soon (possibly month or two). Sorry if the question is a bit unfortunate, but I'm still new to Fedora package sumbiting system and I'm still not at ease with it.
Btw, where can I check the cvs for F11? I looked here: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/hedgewars/ Doesn't seem to have any branch for F11.
I found it myself. :) http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/hedgewars/
(In reply to comment #2) > Thanx you Alex. I'll check the warning and try to contact the current > maintainer. I think that is the right thing. > > Is tere any possibilty on getting this accepted as a backport then? 0.9.10 is > due to be released soon (possibly month or two). I think is possibile but probably the better thing to do is to talk to the package maintainer (see https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/hedgewars) > Sorry if the question is a bit unfortunate, but I'm still new to Fedora package > sumbiting system and I'm still not at ease with it. No problem. Anyway, if you like to maintain some new package I suggest you to read carefully the http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join and the related links: there are a lot of useful information. Bye.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 257941 ***