Bug 491928 - NFS over GFS issue (fatal: assertion "!bd->bd_pinned && !buffer_busy(bh)" failed)
Summary: NFS over GFS issue (fatal: assertion "!bd->bd_pinned && !buffer_busy(bh)" fai...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Cluster Suite
Classification: Retired
Component: GFS-kernel
Version: 4
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
urgent
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Robert Peterson
QA Contact: Cluster QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 455696
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-03-24 16:59 UTC by Benjamin Kahn
Modified: 2010-01-12 03:22 UTC (History)
21 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-04-28 08:54:22 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2009:0450 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE GFS-kernel bug-fix update 2009-04-28 08:54:19 UTC

Description Benjamin Kahn 2009-03-24 16:59:32 UTC 
This bug has been copied from bug #455696 and has been proposed
to be backported to 4.7 z-stream (EUS).
Comment 3 Chris Feist 2009-03-24 19:09:14 UTC 
Built in GFS-kernel-2.6.9-80.9.el4_7.14
Comment 5 Robert Peterson 2009-03-26 22:59:28 UTC 
I hit a problem and am investigating.  I suspect the patch caused
the problem, so I'm changing the status to FAILS_QA until I can
resolve it.
Comment 6 Robert Peterson 2009-03-27 15:57:03 UTC 
The aforementioned problem turned out to be caused by a small section
of code that I had removed with the patch.  I've pushed an addendum
patch that adds the code back in, and the problem is now fixed.
Therefore, I'm changing the status back to Modified.
Comment 7 Chris Feist 2009-04-08 15:21:42 UTC 
This fix is built into GFS-kernel-2.6.9-80.9.el4_7.15
Comment 8 Chris Feist 2009-04-20 20:10:54 UTC 
Updated packages have been built with another fix:
GFS-kernel-2.6.9-80.9.el4_7.17
Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2009-04-28 08:54:22 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0450.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.