Bug 494994 - Twinkle srpm doesn't build without qt3-devel
Summary: Twinkle srpm doesn't build without qt3-devel
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: twinkle
Version: 10
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kevin Fenzi
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-04-09 00:04 UTC by Cory Jaeger
Modified: 2009-04-09 14:53 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-04-09 14:53:53 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Cory Jaeger 2009-04-09 00:04:57 UTC
Description of problem:
.spec file should be updated to include build requirement of qt3-devel or to add --disable-qt-check to %configure

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.4.2-1

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Download src.rpm
2. rpmbuild --rebuild it
  
Actual results:
Build fails with complaint of missing qt-mt.pc

Expected results:
Successful build

Comment 1 Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 00:24:55 UTC
The spec has a BuildRequire on kdelibs3-devel, which should require qt3-devel... 

Is that not being pulled in?

Comment 2 Cory Jaeger 2009-04-09 00:52:18 UTC
Arrg.  I forgot that I had removed BuildRequire kdelibs3-devel last night.  I was building a custom rpm that installs without all the kde fluff and kde-addressbook tie-in.

As it's really a problem with mucking about with the .spec and not strictly a problem with the .spec I offer my apologies. My bad.

I can understand why sub-dependancies wouldn't be included.  Although if qt3-devel had been in there it would have saved me an hour figuring out how to build my non-kde rpm.

Comment 3 Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 02:16:35 UTC
Yeah, sorry about that. :( 

I suppose I could add qt3-devel in there just in case... 

Anyhow, shall we close this now?

Comment 4 Cory Jaeger 2009-04-09 14:53:53 UTC
Yeah.  I suspect that most people who would take the time to edit the .spec file and make a non-kde build of twinkle would be able to eventually figure out what was wrong.  And it's not really a bug when it's due to end-user customization of the package so closing this would probably be best.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.