+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #495247 +++ but the error is slightly different: NameError: global name 'device' is not defined anaconda 11.5.0.38 exception report Traceback (most recent call first): File "/usr/lib/anaconda/storage/devices.py", line 2687, in eject log.warning("error ejecting cdrom %s: %s" % (device, e)) File "/usr/lib/anaconda/installmethod.py", line 47, in doMethodComplete dev.eject() File "/usr/lib/anaconda/dispatch.py", line 205, in moveStep rc = stepFunc(self.anaconda) File "/usr/lib/anaconda/dispatch.py", line 128, in gotoNext self.moveStep() File "/usr/lib/anaconda/gui.py", line 1317, in nextClicked self.anaconda.dispatch.gotoNext() File "/usr/lib/anaconda/iw/progress_gui.py", line 79, in renderCallback self.intf.icw.nextClicked() File "/usr/lib/anaconda/gui.py", line 1338, in handleRenderCallback self.currentWindow.renderCallback() NameError: global name 'device' is not defined Local variables in innermost frame: fd: 78 _isys: <module '_isys' from '/usr/lib/anaconda/_isys.so'> e: (5, 'Input/output error') self: OpticalDevice instance (0x7ffbb1993290) -- description = name = sr0 status = True parents = [] kids = 0 uuid = None format = <storage.formats.fs.Iso9660FS object at 0x7ffbb19934d0> size = 0 major = 11 minor = 0 exists = True sysfs path = /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.2/host1/target1:0:0/1:0:0:0/block/sr0 label = None target size = 0 path = /dev/sr0 format args = [] Full traceback attached
Anaconda hung shortly on the package installation screen. It seemed to have installed all of the packages. I was able to reboot the system and finish the installation, but yum is not able to do an update at the moment. ... Think I've got yum working now. Seems to be related to yum not recognizing the http_proxy environment variable
(In reply to comment #0) > +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #495247 +++ > but the error is slightly different: > NameError: global name 'device' is not defined this seems to be a dupe of bug 492459, since the first part of the trace is identical, but the second part referencing scsi nodes differs. if you still think this traceback is unique, please re-open ;0 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 492459 ***