Bug 496038 - PATCH: fix drive order in isw raid01 setups to match BIOS driver order
Summary: PATCH: fix drive order in isw raid01 setups to match BIOS driver order
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: dmraid
Version: 5.4
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Heinz Mauelshagen
QA Contact: Cluster QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 475386
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-04-16 08:36 UTC by Hans de Goede
Modified: 2009-09-02 11:17 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-09-02 11:17:03 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
PATCH: fix drive order in isw raid01 setups to match BIOS driver order (414 bytes, patch)
2009-04-16 08:36 UTC, Hans de Goede
no flags Details | Diff


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2009:1347 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE dmraid bug-fix and enhancement update 2009-09-01 10:47:31 UTC

Description Hans de Goede 2009-04-16 08:36:30 UTC
Created attachment 339812 [details]
PATCH: fix drive order in isw raid01 setups to match BIOS driver order

Description of problem:
This patch fixes a mismatch between BIOS and dmraid's view of ISW raid 01 sets,
so that after we've written data to it, the BIOS can actually read the data
sanely. This fixes booting from ISW raid 10 sets.

This patch is quite trivial and has been extensively tested in Fedora.

Comment 2 Denise Dumas 2009-04-16 12:31:32 UTC
Note that this is not additional work for QA, because verifying 475386 (including successful boot after install) also verifies this patch.

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2009-09-02 11:17:03 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1347.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.