Bug 498714 - Review Request: gitg - GTK+ graphical interface for the git revision control system
Summary: Review Request: gitg - GTK+ graphical interface for the git revision control ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Susi Lehtola
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-05-02 13:30 UTC by James Bowes
Modified: 2013-01-10 10:03 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-05-13 13:40:43 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
susi.lehtola: fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description James Bowes 2009-05-02 13:30:35 UTC
Spec URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gitg.spec
SRPM URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gitg-0.0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm
Description:
gitg is a GitX clone for GNOME/gtk+. It aims at being a small, fast and
convenient tool to visualize git history and actions that benefit from a
graphical presentation.

Comment 1 Susi Lehtola 2009-05-03 07:02:54 UTC
- You don't need a vendor tag to build, and if you do it should be empty: --vendor="" according to the policy.

- Package does not build in mock, at least dbus-devel is missing.

- The build might also fail on schema installation, which you may need to disable:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GConf

Comment 2 Susi Lehtola 2009-05-04 18:50:45 UTC
Once you have fixed the mock build issue I will review the package.

Comment 3 James Bowes 2009-05-07 11:43:57 UTC
Updated:
Spec URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gitg.spec
SRPM URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gitg-0.0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm

Thanks for the feedback, Jussi. The package now builds in mock under f10 and rawhide. I think the vendor and gconf bits are cleaned up, too.

Comment 4 Susi Lehtola 2009-05-07 12:26:09 UTC
rpmlint output:
gitg.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gitg.schemas
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

- The same kind of warnings seem to be made by also other packages that have gconf schemas so this is probably OK to ignore.


MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. NEEDSFIX
- No mixing of %{buildroot} and RPM_BUILD_ROOT!

MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the  Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK

MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSFIX
- Time stamps are not preserved, add INSTALL="install -p" as argument to make install.

MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK

MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSFIX
- Add ChangeLog to %doc.

MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK

Comment 5 James Bowes 2009-05-10 14:26:25 UTC
Updated:
Spec URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gitg.spec
SRPM URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gitg-0.0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm

- %{buildroot} changed to $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
- ChangeLog added to %doc
- INSTALL="install -p" used for make install

Comment 6 Susi Lehtola 2009-05-10 15:59:57 UTC
Even though you didn't increment the release tag as you should have, the package has been

APPROVED.

Comment 7 James Bowes 2009-05-12 13:40:39 UTC
Thanks for the review, Jussi!

Comment 8 James Bowes 2009-05-12 13:53:39 UTC
New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: gitg
Short Description: GTK+ graphical interface for the git revision control system
Owners: jbowes
Branches: F10 F11
InitialCC:

Comment 9 Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-13 05:11:43 UTC
cvs done.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.