Bug 499838 - Libvirt (virt-manager, virsh) fail to launch any virtual machines
Summary: Libvirt (virt-manager, virsh) fail to launch any virtual machines
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 499569
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: libvirt
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Daniel Veillard
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-05-08 14:19 UTC by Joonas Sarajärvi
Modified: 2009-05-09 22:22 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-05-09 22:22:07 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Libvirt's log file for a virtual machine that is having problems starting (4.12 KB, text/plain)
2009-05-08 14:25 UTC, Joonas Sarajärvi
no flags Details

Description Joonas Sarajärvi 2009-05-08 14:19:28 UTC
Description of problem:

After installing the latest libvirt from rawhide, my virtual machines (all of them KVM based) no longer seem to start. Instead, the libvirt tools tell me that the machine "didn't show up". Virtual machines did work fine a few days ago.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
libvirt-0.6.2-6.fc11.x86_64

How reproducible:
Always on this machine

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install latest updates from Rawhide
2. Try to start a virtual machine with virt-manager or virsh
  
Actual results:

[root@localhost ~]# virsh start Rawhide0
error: Failed to start domain Rawhide0
error: internal error Domain Rawhide0 didn't show up


[root@localhost ~]#

Expected results:
No errors, virtual machines start normally.

Comment 1 Joonas Sarajärvi 2009-05-08 14:25:28 UTC
Created attachment 343097 [details]
Libvirt's log file for a virtual machine that is having problems starting

The issue seems to be somehow related to SELinux. It is possible that I just have some files mislabeled. After setenforce 0, my virtual machines seem to work again. They used to work without disabling SELinux, though.

Comment 2 Cole Robinson 2009-05-09 22:22:07 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 499569 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.