Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
Description of problem: Under F11's version of sound-juicer the track numbers of ripped tracks are no longer being represented by 2 digits. This causes sorting problems. I have verified that sound-juicer in F10 correctly uses 2 digits to represent track numbers. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): sound-juicer-2.26.1-1.fc11 How reproducible: every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. rip CD 2. list contents directory where ripped files reside 3. Actual results: tracks 1-9 are represented by single digit track numbers Expected results: tracks 1-9 should appear as 01, 02, 03, etc Additional info:
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 11 development cycle. Changing version to '11'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
I noticed this too; this is due to a change in the default file patterns in the source code of sound-juicer 2.26 (compared with sound-juicer 2.24). The simplest way to work around is probably to change the gconf key apps/sound_juicer/file_pattern (which, in gconf-editor, has plenty of help listing the possible codes, e.g., %tN is the track number with padding for sorting).
Thx for the pointer Emmanuel, I haven't been ripping any CD's as of late so hadn't bothered poking around at this. When I have "Number - Title" selected for the file name pref the gconf key is "%dn - %tt" under F11 whereas it was "%tN - %tt" under F10. I can see making the change to use %d as it nicely handles the multi-disk cases, however I'd argue that it should instead be using the zero-padded %dN code. Either that or add an option "Track Number - Title" to the file name prefs (which uses %tN). Bastien - your thoughts?
I looked at that code, and it's plenty scary, and I'm not too sure what to make of it. Dave, or Emmanuel, could you please file an upstream bug and mention the problems you encountered? (FWIW, I hacked on sound-juicer from the start, and got my patterns into the code very early, so I wouldn't have to hack around them)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604191
Thanks.