Fixed in policycoreutils-gui-2.0.62-12.5.fc11.x86_64

For what it is worth I also get this error in FC 10 with policycoreutils-gui-2.0.57-21.fc10.x86_64 

The end result is that i cannot start the SELinux Management tool from the System | Administation menu nor from the command line.

Thanks

Brad

Iḿ getting the same problem with version policycoreutils-gui-2.0.57-21.fc10.x86_64

After update (2009-05-24)
maybe:
selinux-policy-targeted-3.5.13-59.fc10.noarch
selinux-policy-3.5.13-59.fc10.noarch

root run system-config-selinux

# system-config-selinux
/usr/share/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.py:72: Warning: IA__g_object_get_valist: object class `GnomeProgram' has no property named `default-icon'
xml = gtk.glade.XML ("/usr/share/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.glade", domain=PROGNAME)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.py", line 188, in <module>
app = childWindow()
File "/usr/share/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.py", line 91, in __init__
self.add_page(portsPage.portsPage(xml))
File "/usr/share/system-config-selinux/portsPage.py", line 69, in __init__
self.load()
File "/usr/share/system-config-selinux/portsPage.py", line 136, in load
self.store.set_value(iter, PROTOCOL_COL, k[2])
IndexError: tuple index out of range

thanks!

This issue is also fixed in policycoreutils-2.0.57-22.fc10

How can I implement this patch (policycoreutils-2.0.57-22.fc10)?
yum update policycoreutils reports that no packagers are marked up for update.

Ben

Try --enablerepo=updates-testing

It has been pushed to stable before a while and I believe that it will be available soon from updates repo. 

But you can try the option that Dan mentioned above. It should work yet.

policycoreutils-2.0.57-22.fc10 is unstable now. And so on.

Might be that this version is unstable but after 'yum update policycoreutils --enablerepo=updates-testing' system-config-selinux works again.

Thanks

policycoreutils-2.0.57-22.fc10  was already the stable edition now.

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 11 development cycle.
Changing version to '11'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

The same problem here.

System: Fedora 11 x86

Error Message:

# system-config-selinux 
/usr/share/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.py:72: Warning: IA__g_object_get_valist: object class `GnomeProgram' has no property named `default-icon'
  xml = gtk.glade.XML ("/usr/share/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.glade", domain=PROGNAME)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/share/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.py", line 188, in <module>
    app = childWindow()
  File "/usr/share/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.py", line 86, in __init__
    self.add_page(booleansPage.booleansPage(xml))
  File "/usr/share/system-config-selinux/booleansPage.py", line 139, in __init__
    self.load(self.filter)
  File "/usr/share/system-config-selinux/booleansPage.py", line 202, in load
    booleansList = self.booleans.get_all(self.local)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/seobject.py", line 1863, in get_all
    value.append(selinux.security_get_boolean_pending(name))
OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory



Packages Version:

checkpolicy-2.0.19-2.fc11.i586
policycoreutils-2.0.62-12.14.fc11.i586
policycoreutils-gui-2.0.62-12.14.fc11.i586
policycoreutils-python-2.0.62-12.14.fc11.i586
libselinux-2.0.80-1.fc11.i586
libselinux-devel-2.0.80-1.fc11.i586
libselinux-python-2.0.80-1.fc11.i586
libselinux-utils-2.0.80-1.fc11.i586
selinux-doc-1.26-4.noarch
selinux-policy-3.6.12-86.fc11.noarch
selinux-policy-targeted-3.6.12-86.fc11.noarch


NB:
When i used fedora 10 system-config-selinux worked fine.

What says 'sestatus' ?

In my case:

$ sestatus

SELinux status:                 enabled
SELinuxfs mount:                /selinux
Current mode:                   permissive
Mode from config file:          permissive
Policy version:                 24
Policy from config file:        targeted

That's ok. Could you also try to execute

yum reinstall selinux-policy-targeted policycoreutils-\*

No luck 
I re-installed selinux-policy-targeted and policycoreutils-\*  as indicated above but the problem still persist.

I think it would probably be best to tar up /etc/selinux and send it to us so we could see what is going on.

Email to dwalsh.

i have sent my /etc/selinux as suggested.

also, i have a fresh installation of fedora 12 beta (a vm) and system-config-selinux work fine i get only one warning.

# system-config-selinux 

/usr/share/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.py:72: Warning:
IA__g_object_get_valist: object class `GnomeProgram' has no property named
`default-icon'
  xml = gtk.glade.XML
("/usr/share/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.glade",
domain=PROGNAME)

i think that enabling updates testing can solve this (f11 bug), but this is my production laptop, so i will wait for fedora 12.

I installed your /etc/selinux on a fully updated F11 system and I have no problems running system-config-selinux.

I am using a slightly newer -15 policycoreutils

Solved after doing this:

setenforce 0
mv /etc/selinux/targeted /etc/selinux/targeted.old
yum --enablerepo=updates-testing reinstall selinux-policy-targted
restorecon -R -v /etc



Now system-config-selinux work fire!

# system-config-selinux 

/usr/share/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.py:72: Warning:
IA__g_object_get_valist: object class `GnomeProgram' has no property named
`default-icon'
  xml = gtk.glade.XML
("/usr/share/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.glade",
domain=PROGNAME)

Must have been some strange protection error.

This message is a reminder that Fedora 11 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 11.  It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained.  At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 
'version' of '11'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 11's end of life.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that 
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 11 is end of life.  If you 
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it 
against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this 
bug to the applicable version.  If you are unable to change the version, 
please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events.  Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Fedora 11 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2010-06-25. Fedora 11 is 
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further 
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of 
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.