Bug 501762 - add wbpriv group with gid 88
Summary: add wbpriv group with gid 88
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: setup
Version: 5.4
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Ondrej Vasik
QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-05-20 15:56 UTC by Guenther Deschner
Modified: 2012-02-21 05:38 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-02-21 05:38:51 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2012:0198 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE setup bug fix and enhancement update 2012-02-20 14:54:05 UTC

Description Guenther Deschner 2009-05-20 15:56:38 UTC
Description of problem:
Samba in Fedora creates a group called wbpriv with gid 88 during installation in order to share the permissions of a socket with squid. The new 5.4 package samba3x should also provide this generated group with the same gid (although squid in RHEL5 does not yet benefit from it). 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Ondrej Vasik 2009-05-20 21:03:37 UTC
Ok, no problem ... unfortunately 1 week late to include it into 5.4 setup fastrack errata, so it has to wait for next setup RHEL-5 update.

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2009-11-06 18:44:09 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion, but this component is not scheduled to be updated in
the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. If you would like
this request to be reviewed for the next minor release, ask your
support representative to set the next rhel-x.y flag to "?".

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2012-02-21 05:38:51 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0198.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.