Bug 502078 - atd started on resume from suspend?
Summary: atd started on resume from suspend?
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: at
Version: 11
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Marcela Mašláňová
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-05-21 18:48 UTC by James Ralston
Modified: 2009-08-10 19:01 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 3.1.10-31.fc11
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-08-10 07:55:08 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description James Ralston 2009-05-21 18:48:00 UTC
[I'm filing against pm-utils, but that's just a guess.]

Even though atd is not configured to run in any runlevel, whenever my Fedora 11 Preview laptop resumes from a suspend, atd is running:

$ /sbin/chkconfig | grep atd
atd             0:off   1:off   2:off   3:off   4:off   5:off   6:off

$ env - /sbin/service atd status
atd is stopped

$ pm-suspend --auto-quirks

[wait for system to suspend; then resume]

$ /sbin/chkconfig | grep atd
atd             0:off   1:off   2:off   3:off   4:off   5:off   6:off

$ env - /sbin/service atd status
atd (pid  8319) is running...

This shouldn't happen.

I've tried to figure out what is starting atd, but failed.

Versions:

0:at-3.1.10-30.fc11.x86_64
0:pm-utils-1.2.5-2.fc11.x86_64

Comment 1 Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 16:16:58 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 11 development cycle.
Changing version to '11'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 2 Marcela Mašláňová 2009-07-14 12:46:41 UTC
> I've tried to figure out what is starting atd, but failed.
> 
> Versions:
> 
> 0:at-3.1.10-30.fc11.x86_64
> 0:pm-utils-1.2.5-2.fc11.x86_64  

My fault. I didn't check after suspend whether atd daemon was on/off. I reassign it to at package.

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2009-07-17 11:46:16 UTC
at-3.1.10-31.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/at-3.1.10-31.fc11

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2009-07-22 22:00:41 UTC
at-3.1.10-31.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update at'.  You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7884

Comment 5 Philippe 2009-07-24 07:54:32 UTC
HP 2140 - Fedora 11

When booting, it seems to loop on "Starting ATD" : GUI is not coming and I don't know how to resume start-up process (I'm newbie).
Every 3 or 4 minutes the screen shows start-up text for half a second and went dark again. I stroked F2 to get it verbose.

Yesterday night as I had just installed Fedora, everything was looking ok.

This morning, trying to switch on the mini bring me this issue.

Is there a way to resume ?

Comment 6 Marcela Mašláňová 2009-07-24 08:14:28 UTC
I suppose this is not related issue. Probably the next service won't start.

I suggest to check fedoraforum.org or irc channel for fedora newbies questions.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2009-07-31 18:04:55 UTC
at-3.1.10-31.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 8 James Ralston 2009-08-04 14:32:20 UTC
I apologize for the delay in getting back to this.

at-3.1.10-31.fc11 still automatically starts on resume from suspend, even if it's not configured to run (via chkconfig).

What is the mechanism that's being used to start it after a resume? If I knew that, I could probably figure out what's happening...

Comment 9 Marcela Mašláňová 2009-08-10 07:55:08 UTC
After longer discussion it was fixed in rawhide properly.

The daemon shouldn't start if you don't have a script:
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/56atd 
Pm-utils is checking quirks in this directory and run these scripts.

I'm afraid it won't be possible to backport fix from rawhide into F-11.

Comment 10 James Ralston 2009-08-10 19:01:53 UTC
As long as it's fixed properly going forward, that's fine.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.