Bug 502442 - There is a goes-back issue for sosreport
Summary: There is a goes-back issue for sosreport
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: sos
Version: 5.5
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Adam Stokes
QA Contact: BaseOS QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 502704
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-05-25 10:20 UTC by Vivian Bian
Modified: 2016-04-26 14:13 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 502704 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-03-30 08:07:22 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2010:0201 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE sosreport bug fix and enhancement update 2010-03-29 12:26:44 UTC

Description Vivian Bian 2009-05-25 10:20:13 UTC
Description of problem:
as summary, progress reporting procedure simply cannot estimate total work correctly.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
sos-1.7-9.16.el5

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. perform sosreport command in the terminal
2. watch the progress reporting 
3.
  
Actual results:
Progress 1% -> 4% ->2% ->3%->4% ->2%->6% ->2% ->96%-> 100% ->98% ->100% ->96% ->100% 

Expected results:
progress reporting procedure simply can estimate total work correctly

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jia Dong 2009-05-25 11:32:03 UTC
Another condition:
After process reached 100%,the real time and estimated finished time will grow together for several seconds.

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2010-03-30 08:07:22 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0201.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.