Bug 502537 (vrrpd) - Review Request: vrrpd - Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (Daemon only)
Summary: Review Request: vrrpd - Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (Daemon only)
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: vrrpd
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: http://www.imagestream.com/VRRP.html
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-Legal
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-05-25 23:33 UTC by Wilmer Jaramillo M.
Modified: 2010-02-07 14:18 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-02-07 14:18:32 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Wilmer Jaramillo M. 2009-05-25 23:33:39 UTC
Spec URL: http://wilmer.fedorapeople.org/files/review/vrrpd/vrrpd.spec
SRPM URL: http://wilmer.fedorapeople.org/files/review/vrrpd/vrrpd-1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm

Description: VRRPd is an implementation of Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol as  specified  in rfc2338.  VRRPd  is  interoperable with  other RFC-based VRRP implementations, including Cisco and Juniper, and is included as a standard feature on ImageStream routers.

Comment 1 Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-05-25 23:46:35 UTC
please fix

1 - BuildRoot  

-> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot

2- BuildRequires
-> every fedora linux have kernel installed by default, doesn't  need kernel in build requires, you need only kernel-devel.

3- install section

please simplify things using install -Dp -m so you reduce the size of your spec file.

:-)

Comment 2 Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-05-25 23:49:25 UTC
after you fix these things, please post here the new spec file and a koji scratch build, this will speed up the review process.

Comment 4 Fabian Deutsch 2009-07-28 15:22:00 UTC
AFAIK Cisco is holding some patents on VRRP, so can this be part of Fedora anyway?
CARP is a patent free solution.

Comment 5 Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 19:21:41 UTC
If you have legal questions you should make the ticket block FE-Legal so that the folks who understand such things can take a look.  I'll do that now.

Comment 6 Fabian Deutsch 2010-02-07 14:18:32 UTC
Closing

More about thos patents: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_Router_Redundancy_Protocol


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.