Spec URL: http://rapidshare.com/files/247749721/pypoppler.spec.html SRPM URL: http://rapidshare.com/files/247750206/pypoppler-0.10.0-1.fc11.src.rpm.html Description: Python bindings for the Poppler PDF rendering library. It is needed to run programs written in Python and using Poppler set.
gedit-latex-plugin-0.2rc2-1 : New upstream rc version this package depends on pypoppler package Spec URL : http://rapidshare.com/files/247752065/gedit-latex-plugin.spec.html SRPM URL : http://rapidshare.com/files/247754470/gedit-latex-plugin-0.2rc2-1.fc11.src.rpm.html This new version have a nice preview pane for produced pdfs, which accelerate latex writing speed considerably
Is this your first package for Fedora? I don't see any account under your name in the account system, and I'd guess you aren't in the packager group because instead of fedoraproject.org space you're using rapidshare links which make it rather difficult to even take a look at your package.
Yes, it is right, I am not in the packager group, the procedure is just too long. I thought that my contributions are welcome, but anyway, I am setting up my own repo for people who want to test my packages. And thanks for your gentle reply.
Ok, I have done a successful koji build : SPEC URL : http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SPECS/pypoppler.spec SRPM URL : http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SRPMS/pypoppler-0.10.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Koji build page : https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1450585
You will need to remove the .la file https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries Also %{_libdir}/python2.6/site-packages is wrong https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#System_Architecture Here's an example http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/SPECS/pypoppler.spec P.S I'm not going to review your package as you need a sponsor.
Ok, I updated the spec file
Hi Hicham, One of the first things you should do to any specfile, is run rpmlint on it. rpmlint will show any errors or warnings there are on your Specfile, like mixed use of spaces and tabs. rpmlint said: pypoppler.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 20) Also, what Leigh said about the Static Libraries is right. On %configure, use --disable-static and on %install, remove the la file, using: rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib}/*.la I updated your specfile with these changes. http://proyectofedora.org/mexico/pypoppler.spec
Ok updated the spec file
Please post the full URLs of your spec/srpm files every time you modified them. Also please make it sure that you change the release number of the spec file to avoid confusion.
Updated SPEC URL : http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SPECS/pypoppler.spec SRPM URL : http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SRPMS/pypoppler-0.10.0-2.fc11.src.rpm Koji build page : https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1454701
*** Bug 510962 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
In Bug #510962 I made this package under the name of python-poppler and Jason reviewed and approved it. But after that I renamed the package to pypoppler as Jason suggested and we run into this duplication. Hicham, do you still want to go on with this package?
Hi Fabian, No problem if u want to maintain it, what is important is that it must be in Fedora. I introduced it because I needed it to use the latest gedit-latex-plugin which displays a nice preview pane that requires pypoppler. So my final answer is : if you want to take it, go ahead.
pypoppler is needed for pdfshuffler as well that was the reason because I made the spec file in April. Ok, I will reopen my review request and close this one.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 510962 ***