Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
For bugs related to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 product line. The current stable release is 5.10. For Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and above, please visit Red Hat JIRA https://issues.redhat.com/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa?pid=12332745 to report new issues.

Bug 507625

Summary: [RHEL5.4 FEAT] Update ixgbe to version 2.0.8-k2 and support the 82599 (Niantic) device
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: RHEL Program Management <pm-rhel>
Component: distributionAssignee: RHEL Program Management <pm-rhel>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Release Test Team <release-test-team-automation>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 5.4CC: abdulkh, agospoda, akent, aparanja, bugproxy, bzeranski, jburke, jesse.brandeburg, jjarvis, john.ronciak, jpallich, jvillalo, keve.a.gabbert, martin.wilck, masaki.kimura.kz, mbrodeur, noboru.obata.ar, pbog, pbunyan, peterm, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr, pm-eus, saguchi, scofeldm, takahiro.yasui.mp
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: FutureFeature, HardwareEnablement
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-09-06 08:17:46 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 472547    
Bug Blocks: 460949    

Description RHEL Program Management 2009-06-23 14:27:15 UTC 
This bug has been copied from bug #472547 and has been proposed
to be backported to 5.3 z-stream (EUS).
Comment 2 Andy Gospodarek 2009-06-23 14:40:04 UTC 
(In reply to comment #0)
> This bug has been copied from bug #472547 and has been proposed
> to be backported to 5.3 z-stream (EUS).  

You really just mean: proposed for a DUD, right?

We aren't going to pull this code into the base 5.3.z, are we?
Comment 3 Ronald Pacheco 2009-06-24 16:12:03 UTC 
Gospo,

That is correct.  DUD.