Bug 507794 - S-c-tools cleanup: add uninstall support - suggestion
Summary: S-c-tools cleanup: add uninstall support - suggestion
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: system-config-language
Version: 12
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Pravin Satpute
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 493604
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-06-24 10:18 UTC by Jaroslav Reznik
Modified: 2009-12-28 11:05 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-12-28 11:05:43 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jaroslav Reznik 2009-06-24 10:18:28 UTC
Description of problem: there's no possibility for user to uninstall language support installed by s-c-language.

Actual results:
User can't uninstall language support installed by this tool.

Expected results:
User can uninstall language support installed by this tool.

Additional info:
This bug report is part of "System Configuration Tools Cleanup Project". Don't
hesitate to ask project maintainers for any kind of help.

Comment 1 Bug Zapper 2009-11-16 10:23:19 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 12 development cycle.
Changing version to '12'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 2 Pravin Satpute 2009-12-04 07:16:02 UTC
while installing language s-c-l uses

$yum groupinstall langname-support
It is good

but if you do 
$yum groupremove langname-support

it will remove so many packages which are actually need,

 and it is not preferred way, so better user uses yum, or rpm to remove packages he don't want

i guess better to close this bug

Comment 3 Jaroslav Reznik 2009-12-11 13:50:21 UTC
If there's no easy solution revert installation of language pack, then it's ok for me to close this bug as DEFERRED. It should be nice feature to have but it probably needs some yum work or logging PK transaction to remove packages one by one later.

Comment 4 Pravin Satpute 2009-12-28 11:05:43 UTC
Thanks Jaroslav
closing for now, will reopen if we found any good approach to tackle this


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.