Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
Bug 50803 - Add version number to the %{DISTRIBUTION} tag
Add version number to the %{DISTRIBUTION} tag
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: rpm-build (Show other bugs)
i386 Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jeff Johnson
: FutureFeature
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2001-08-03 10:02 EDT by Vidar Langseid
Modified: 2008-05-01 11:38 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2001-08-03 10:02:22 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Vidar Langseid 2001-08-03 10:02:18 EDT
Description of Problem:
This is more like a feature request for your building environment, not for
the rpm-build package itself.

Rpms shipped with RedHat 7.1 has this DISTRIBUTION tag value:
# rpm -q --queryformat "%{DISTRIBUTION}\n" bash
Red Hat Linux

I think that it would be great if the rh version number also was added to
this tag (optioanlly add a DISTRIBUTIONVERSION tag) like this
# rpm -q --queryformat "%{DISTRIBUTION}\n" bash
Red Hat Linux 7.1

rh is not binary compatible between (major) versions. You already have the
depency checking for this but I think it would be a nice feature. It  would
be nice to use when querying rpms which is not yet installed

I hope this will be considered before the next rh release.

How Reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

Actual Results:

Expected Results:

Additional Information:
Comment 1 Jeff Johnson 2001-08-03 10:09:50 EDT
Adding some way of detecting binary incompatibilities is needed,
but Distribution: is not the answer because:
	1) packages built from one Red Hat distribution are
	frequently shipped with another distribution.
	2) there's a whole lot of variance in the values taken
	on by the Distribution tag, even for Red Hat packages.
	Basically, you can't trust what's in the Distribution: tag.
	3) Distribution is pure mechanism, there's no clear semantics
	for when/if/how "binary compatibile" should be reflected in
	a changed Distribution: version.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.