Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

For bugs related to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 product line. The current stable release is 5.10. For Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and above, please visit Red Hat JIRA https://issues.redhat.com/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa?pid=12332745 to report new issues.

Bug 509231

Summary:	EPEL ships a newer version of libksba than what is in RHEL 5.4 beta
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5	Reporter:	Dennis Gilmore <dennis>
Component:	libksba	Assignee:	Peter Vrabec <pvrabec>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:
Severity:	urgent	Docs Contact:
Priority:	urgent
Version:	5.4	CC:	dgilmore, rdieter, sgrubb
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-09-02 09:47:54 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Dennis Gilmore 2009-07-01 20:24:29 UTC

Description of problem:

epel ships libksba-1.0.5-1.el5   while rhel 5.4 beta has  libksba-1.0.2-6.el5  so people who had libksba from epel will not get updgraded to the rhel version and the epel version is no longer supported once rhel 5.4 ships.  it will be removed from the repo at that time.  We need to ensure that there is a clean upgrade path and update the version shipped in RHEL 5.4

Comment 1 Rex Dieter 2009-07-02 14:14:41 UTC

Peter nicely contacted me some time ago about the gnupg2-related pkg movement to rhel 5.4), and we both overlooked this particular upgrade issue.  

My suggestions are:
1.  add an Epoch to the rhel5 pkg,
2.  if you're going to be touching it anyway, at least consider upgrading anyway, as there's been some real improvements and fixes since 1.0.3.

option 1 is probably the safest thing to do at this point, though.

Comment 3 Peter Vrabec 2009-07-02 15:55:20 UTC

I think we can also count with upgrade. Basically, it's same spec file, I only replace tarball. I have already tested it.(rpmlint output was same as from 1.0.2-6)

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2009-09-02 09:47:54 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2009-1295.html