Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 509731
xfbrowser4 should use system xdg-open instead of exo-open
Last modified: 2009-08-01 17:41:42 EDT
Script xfbrowser4 as preferred "browser" use exo-open.
Its must use xdg-open from package xdg-utils, IMHO.
Furthermore, exo-open used incorrectly, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509730
Why? It's a script provided by Xfce, it would make sense to me for it to use exo-open...
Note that there is a RFE upstream to replace these scripts by simple desktop files that just call exo-open. See: http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4360
The other bug is indeed a bug, and filed and dealt with seperately.
Unless there is something missing, I don't see a bug here.
(In reply to comment #1)
> Why? It's a script provided by Xfce, it would make sense to me for it to use
The first and main reason to provide single, reliable approach in all DE environment, as it is main goal of xdg-utils:
The xdg-utils package is a set of simple scripts that provide basic
desktop integration functions for any Free Desktop, such as Linux.
Indeed, such requests filled in many packages, f.e.:
Additional, SIG/XFCE contain xdg-utils (refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Xfce ) but why not wide use it?
Finally, please see: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-October/msg00025.html
If you want to use xdg-utils, why not just use that?
xfbrowser4 is not xdg-utils. It's provided by upstream Xfce, and uses exo-open.
Where are you calling it from, and why not just replace that with a xdg-utils call?
If you feel xfbrowser4 should call xdg-utils, thats much more a discussion for upstream Xfce.
I don't want to replace their script with a fedora specific one.
If you feel this script should use xdg-utils, please ask upstream to do that.
If you can just switch whatever you are using this for to use xdg-utils and have it work as you like, that should work as well.
I'm going to go ahead and close this now... feel free to reopen if there is some further discussion or a real bug in the script.