Bug 50997 – Postfix is missing

Bug 50997 - Postfix is missing

Summary:	Postfix is missing

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 49934

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Public Beta
Classification:	Retired
Component:	distribution (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	roswell
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Preston Brown
QA Contact:	David Lawrence
Docs Contact:

URL:	http://www.postfix.org/
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2001-08-06 09:43 EDT by Geir Thomassen
Modified:	2007-04-18 12:35 EDT (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2001-08-08 15:51:31 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Geir Thomassen 2001-08-06 09:43:05 EDT

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20010803

Description of problem:
Postfix is missing, it used to be on the powertools CD (RH 7.1). Please
don't drop support for this excellent mail server in RH 7.2

Comment 1 Florian La Roche 2001-08-07 04:15:24 EDT

We'll work on a solution for this as we know about the importance of this
excellent mailer. No promises though... :-)

Florian La Roche

Comment 2 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer 2001-08-08 13:25:14 EDT

Assigning to correct component

Comment 3 Bill Crawford 2001-08-08 15:51:28 EDT

Please could exim be included also?  It has a good reputation for
configurability and so on, and would offer a useful alternative to sendmail.

Plus, I want to use it myself ;o)

Comment 4 Preston Brown 2001-08-13 16:16:13 EDT


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 49934 ***

Comment 5 Chris Ricker 2001-08-13 16:21:28 EDT

Is it kosher to close a public bug by saying it's a duplicate of a
beta-program-only bug?

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.