Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 51086

Summary: System Settings icon should not show when there are no such settings
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Public Beta Reporter: Kenny Graunke <kenny>
Component: control-centerAssignee: Havoc Pennington <hp>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: roswell   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2001-08-07 16:52:18 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Kenny Graunke 2001-08-07 07:10:40 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010725

Description of problem:
The "System Settings" icon appears even if double clicking it just shows an
empty folder (i.e. there are no system settings available)

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open the Start Here folder.
2. (Click System Settings, observe empty folder.)
	

Actual Results:  The System Settings icon shows, but only opens an empty
folder.

Expected Results:  The System Settings icon should not even appear in the
Start Here folder unless there is something meaningful to do with it.

Additional info:

System Settings is the only one I have this for - I also have no Favorites,
but that should clearly stay, as I believe the point is that users can add
things there. I don't think this is the case with System Settings, however.

Comment 1 Havoc Pennington 2001-08-07 16:52:12 UTC
I think the bug here is "there isn't anything in system settings" - there always
should be. I'm poking people to get this fixed. ;-)

Comment 2 Havoc Pennington 2002-02-11 21:28:05 UTC
I think it always contains something now. If it doesn't in certain cases we need
to file bugs against the installer or something.