Bug 511560 - FTBFS qtparted-0.4.5-19.fc11
Summary: FTBFS qtparted-0.4.5-19.fc11
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: qtparted
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Steven Pritchard
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/Fi...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F12FTBFS
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-07-15 03:22 UTC by FTBFS
Modified: 2009-09-12 00:49 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: qtparted-0.4.5-22.fc12
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-09-11 23:24:32 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
root.log (666.16 KB, text/plain)
2009-07-15 03:22 UTC, FTBFS
no flags Details
build.log (18.21 KB, text/plain)
2009-07-15 03:22 UTC, FTBFS
no flags Details
mock.log (1.01 KB, text/plain)
2009-07-15 03:22 UTC, FTBFS
no flags Details
root.log (960.02 KB, text/plain)
2009-07-15 03:22 UTC, FTBFS
no flags Details
build.log (18.52 KB, text/plain)
2009-07-15 03:22 UTC, FTBFS
no flags Details
mock.log (1.02 KB, text/plain)
2009-07-15 03:22 UTC, FTBFS
no flags Details

Description FTBFS 2009-07-15 03:22:21 UTC
qtparted-0.4.5-19.fc11.src.rpm Failed To Build From Source against the rawhide tree.  See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS for more information.

Comment 1 FTBFS 2009-07-15 03:22:24 UTC
Setting to ASSIGNED per Fedora Bug Triage workflow.  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow

Comment 2 FTBFS 2009-07-15 03:22:27 UTC
Created attachment 352465 [details]
root.log

root.log for i386

Comment 3 FTBFS 2009-07-15 03:22:29 UTC
Created attachment 352466 [details]
build.log

build.log for i386

Comment 4 FTBFS 2009-07-15 03:22:30 UTC
Created attachment 352467 [details]
mock.log

mock.log for i386

Comment 5 FTBFS 2009-07-15 03:22:32 UTC
Created attachment 352468 [details]
root.log

root.log for x86_64

Comment 6 FTBFS 2009-07-15 03:22:34 UTC
Created attachment 352469 [details]
build.log

build.log for x86_64

Comment 7 FTBFS 2009-07-15 03:22:35 UTC
Created attachment 352470 [details]
mock.log

mock.log for x86_64

Comment 8 Alex Lancaster 2009-08-26 07:27:08 UTC
There was one obvious problem that I fixed: adding an explicit BuildRequires for libuuid-devel.  But that doesn't get it to build, there is some deeper problem with the code, get error messages like:

qp_libparted.cpp: In member function 'bool QP_LibParted::_partition_warn_busy(PedPartition*)':
qp_libparted.cpp:1751: error: 'ped_free' was not declared in this scope

log here:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1634281&name=build.log

full build here:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=129265

Comment 9 Milos Jakubicek 2009-09-11 23:24:32 UTC
Alex, I just fixed this using a patch coming from Debian. Please review that the solution doesn't have any unexpected side-effects, if you can. Thanks

P.S.: Do not hesitate to ask for help on fedora-devel-list or #fedora-devel in case you're in trouble with FTBFS bugs.

Comment 10 Alex Lancaster 2009-09-12 00:20:50 UTC
(In reply to comment #9)
> Alex, I just fixed this using a patch coming from Debian. Please review that
> the solution doesn't have any unexpected side-effects, if you can. Thanks

Thanks.  I don't have a rawhide box to test on right now, but I'll try it out if and when I do.

> P.S.: Do not hesitate to ask for help on fedora-devel-list or #fedora-devel in
> case you're in trouble with FTBFS bugs.  

Sure, in general I do just that especially with packages I own or co-maintain, but since I'm not the maintainer of this package I felt this should really be the maintainers responsibility.  I was just in my "trying to get the broken deps list shorter" provenpackager mode. ;)

Comment 11 Milos Jakubicek 2009-09-12 00:49:20 UTC
(In reply to comment #10)

> Sure, in general I do just that especially with packages I own or co-maintain,
> but since I'm not the maintainer of this package I felt this should really be
> the maintainers responsibility.  I was just in my "trying to get the broken
> deps list shorter" provenpackager mode. ;)  

Alex, I'm sorry then (didn't realize you're not the maintainer)!
...btw, this was my "trying to get the FTBFS list shorter" provenpackager mode:), in case you'd like to join this mode, look here: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/need-rebuild.html

Regards,
Milos


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.