Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 512145 - (CVE-2009-2470) CVE-2009-2470 Mozilla data corruption with SOCKS5 reply
CVE-2009-2470 Mozilla data corruption with SOCKS5 reply
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability (Show other bugs)
unspecified
All Linux
low Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Red Hat Product Security
http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/det...
impact=low,source=mozilla,reported=20...
: Security
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2009-07-16 10:27 EDT by Josh Bressers
Modified: 2013-04-12 18:02 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-04-12 18:02:00 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2010:0153 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: thunderbird security update 2010-03-17 08:38:49 EDT
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2010:0154 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: thunderbird security update 2010-03-17 09:22:56 EDT

  None (edit)
Description Josh Bressers 2009-07-16 10:27:24 EDT
Andrej Andolsek reported that when Firefox receives a reply from a SOCKS5
proxy which contains a DNS name longer than 15 characters, the subsequent
data stream in the response can become corrupted. There was no evidence of
memory corruption, however, and the severity of the issue was determined to
be low.

References:
  [1] http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-2470
  [2] http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2009/mfsa2009-38.html
  [3] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459524
  [4] http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/35925
  [5] http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1022665
  [6] http://secunia.com/advisories/36126
  [7] http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/2142
  [8] http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/52252
Comment 2 errata-xmlrpc 2010-03-17 08:39:16 EDT
This issue has been addressed in following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5

Via RHSA-2010:0153 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0153.html
Comment 3 errata-xmlrpc 2010-03-17 09:25:37 EDT
This issue has been addressed in following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4

Via RHSA-2010:0154 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0154.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.