Bug 512889 - RFE: sosreport to capture iscsi initiator settings if present.
Summary: RFE: sosreport to capture iscsi initiator settings if present.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: sos
Version: 5.5
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Adam Stokes
QA Contact: BaseOS QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-07-21 08:30 UTC by Sirius Rayner-Karlsson
Modified: 2010-03-30 08:07 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-03-30 08:07:58 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2010:0201 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE sosreport bug fix and enhancement update 2010-03-29 12:26:44 UTC

Description Sirius Rayner-Karlsson 2009-07-21 08:30:14 UTC
Description of problem:
Even in the latest sos package, if iscsi initiator is present and used, sosreport does not capture the settings for this.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
sos-1.7-9.16.el5_3.5

How reproducible:
Very.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. install iscsi-initiator-utils and configure /etc/iscsi/iscsid.conf
2. discover and login to target(s)
3. run sosreport
  
Actual results:
/etc/iscsi/* and /var/lib/iscsi/* are not present in sosreport archive

Expected results:
/etc/iscsi/* and /var/lib/iscsi/* to be present in sosreport archive

Additional info:
It would just be helpful to have this present in the archive when there is a iSCSI issue to debug. That's all.

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2010-03-30 08:07:58 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0201.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.