Bug 513294 - Use Cobbler network_config snippet in spacewalk kickstarts
Summary: Use Cobbler network_config snippet in spacewalk kickstarts
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA
Alias: None
Product: Spacewalk
Classification: Community
Component: Server
Version: 0.6
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jan Pazdziora (Red Hat)
QA Contact: Red Hat Satellite QA List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: space16
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-07-22 21:14 UTC by Partha Aji
Modified: 2011-09-02 12:21 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-09-02 12:21:27 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Partha Aji 2009-07-22 21:14:17 UTC
Description of problem:
At the present time spacewalk uses an in house mechanism to generate the network boot line for a static network instead of using cobbler's network_config snippet. 

Which means we are not using the full power of the cobbler snippets.. We should move to that

Comment 1 Duncan Innes 2009-10-22 09:25:59 UTC
Commenting from a Satellite user perspective, it's vitally important that the same methods are used to provision machines regardless of how Spacewalk/Satellite manages that.

Current problem with Satellite 5.3 is that cobbler network config is used when doing a re-provision, but not if I CD boot a machine and point it at the same kickstart file on the Satellite.

But would cobbler network_config snippets be as flexible as doing network config inside Activation Keys?  We currently have a fairly straightforward default network config, but it depends on machine type:

Physical: eth0 & eth1 are bonded (bond0)
Virtual: Only eth0 exists on VMware machines

However, certain (normally physical) machine types then have eth2 & eth3 configurations depending on usage.  Is cobbler the best place to be configuring all this?  Would this not mean I have to have different kickstarts for each network type?

Comment 2 Jan Pazdziora (Red Hat) 2010-11-19 16:04:21 UTC
Mass-moving to space13.

Comment 3 Miroslav Suchý 2011-04-11 07:32:56 UTC
We did not have time for this one during Spacewalk 1.4 time frame. Mass moving to Spacewalk 1.5.

Comment 4 Miroslav Suchý 2011-04-11 07:36:58 UTC
We did not have time for this one during Spacewalk 1.4 time frame. Mass moving to Spacewalk 1.5.

Comment 5 Jan Pazdziora (Red Hat) 2011-07-20 11:51:04 UTC
Aligning under space16.

Comment 6 Clifford Perry 2011-08-05 12:42:30 UTC
Changes have happened since this was reported. I wonder if things have improved.

Comment 7 Jan Pazdziora (Red Hat) 2011-08-19 11:36:14 UTC
Partha, is there a patch available, or at least reproducer steps that would show what/how things differ when used one method over the other one? Where to start at all?

Comment 8 Jan Pazdziora (Red Hat) 2011-09-02 12:21:27 UTC
I'm affraid we don't have a working patch, closing.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.