Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 51676 - Incorrect value returned by signal SIGCHLD into siginfo_t.si_pid.
Incorrect value returned by signal SIGCHLD into siginfo_t.si_pid.
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: kernel (Show other bugs)
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Arjan van de Ven
Aaron Brown
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2001-08-13 16:13 EDT by Thomas Smith
Modified: 2008-08-01 12:22 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2004-09-30 11:39:07 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Thomas Smith 2001-08-13 16:13:47 EDT
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)

Description of problem:
If a child process derived from a fork/exec dies and the parent
process has setup a function to catch SIGCHLD, then the
member siginfo_t.si_pid should receive the child's pid. It instead
returns '0'.

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Write 'C' program to do fork/exec-- establish function in parent to catch signal SIGCHLD.
2. Kill child process: # kill 15 <child_process_id>
3. Test value of siginfo_t.si_pid in parent.

Actual Results:  Value of siginfo_t.si_pid is '0'

Expected Results:  Value of siginfo_t.si_pid is process_id of child

Additional info:
Comment 1 Jakub Jelinek 2001-08-15 05:31:08 EDT
This is kernel issue and was fixed long time ago I believe.
Comment 2 Arjan van de Ven 2001-08-15 05:37:36 EDT
What version of the kernel is this ? The 2.2.19 security errata release ?
Comment 3 Bugzilla owner 2004-09-30 11:39:07 EDT
Thanks for the bug report. However, Red Hat no longer maintains this version of
the product. Please upgrade to the latest version and open a new bug if the problem

The Fedora Legacy project (http://fedoralegacy.org/) maintains some older releases, 
and if you believe this bug is interesting to them, please report the problem in
the bug tracker at: http://bugzilla.fedora.us/

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.