Bug 51830 – Directory /usr/X11R6/share/ is not owned by any package

Bug 51830 - Directory /usr/X11R6/share/ is not owned by any package

Summary:	Directory /usr/X11R6/share/ is not owned by any package

Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Public Beta
Classification:	Retired
Component:	filesystem (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	roswell
Hardware:	i386 Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Bill Nottingham
QA Contact:	Aaron Brown
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2001-08-15 12:51 EDT by Joachim Frieben
Modified:	2014-03-16 22:22 EDT (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2001-08-15 15:54:03 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Joachim Frieben 2001-08-15 12:51:24 EDT

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 5.0)

Description of problem:
Directory /usr/X11R6/share/ is not owned by any package which becomes 
obvious when doing an rpm -qf inside /usr/X11R6/. While the other 
subdirectories bin/, lib/, etc. are announced to belong to 'filesystem', 
this is not the case for the share/ subdirectory.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.1.3-1

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. cd /usr/X11R6
2. rpm -qf *

Actual Results:  rpm tells that share/ is not owned by any package.

Expected Results:  rpm should have told that share/ belongs to some 
package - 'filesystem' would have been correct, I guess.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Glen Foster 2001-08-15 15:53:58 EDT

We (Red Hat) really need to fix this before next release.

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2001-08-15 22:17:42 EDT

Will be fixed in 2.1.6-1.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.