Spec URL: http://heffer.fedorapeople.org/review/nforenum.spec
SRPM URL: http://heffer.fedorapeople.org/review/nforenum-3.4.7-0.1.r2184.fc12.src.rpm
It takes as input any number of files that contain something that vaguely
resembles valid NFO, and produces, to the best of its ability, encodable NFO
files, one for each input file.
It also detects and warns about some common mistakes made in NFO coding. All
errors that will cause TTDPatch to reject the GRF during the initialization or
activation phases should be detected; if any are not, it is a bug and should be
reported as such.
Sprites that are too short, not of the correct type (real/pseudo/&c.), too
long, or otherwise not in agreement with their data or the preceeding sprites
are all detected.
I submitted this to improve the building of the OpenGFX package for OpenTTD. Also see https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openttd-opengfx-0.1.0-0.1.alpha6.fc10
Two minor niggles:
It doesn't look like "upx" is actually necessary for the build (only for "make release") - please remove the BuildRequires.
The name of the installed binary is too generic - please rename it to "nforenum".
And a very minor grammatical issue - I would also consider changing the first word of the description to "nforenum".
With those tiny changes, APPROVED.
+ source files match upstream.
diff -qr reveals no differences (svn export, checksum not suitable)
+ package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ summary is OK.
+ description is OK.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is OK.
+ license field matches the actual license.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ license text is included.
+ latest version is being packaged.
- BuildRequires not proper.
doesn't look like upx is actually necessary
+ compiler flags are appropriate.
+ %clean is present.
+ package builds in mock
+ package installs properly.
+ rpmlint has no complaints:
nforenum.src: I: checking
nforenum.x86_64: I: checking
nforenum-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
+ final provides and requires are sane:
nforenum = 3.4.7-0.1.r2184.fc12
nforenum(x86-64) = 3.4.7-0.1.r2184.fc12
+ no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
+ owns the directories it creates.
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
- generically named files
"renum" is too generic - please rename it to "nforenum"
+ code, not content.
+ documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
+ %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
Thank you very much for the review!
New Package CVS Request
Package Name: nforenum
Short Description: A format correcter and linter for the NFO language
Branches: F-10 F-11
nforenum-3.4.7-0.2.r2184.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11.
nforenum-3.4.7-0.2.r2184.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update nforenum'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9354
nforenum-3.4.7-0.2.r2184.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.