Bug 522282
| Summary: | Update anaconda group names and defaults for Virtualization | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Andrew Cathrow <acathrow> |
| Component: | comps | Assignee: | Daniel Mach <dmach> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Alexander Todorov <atodorov> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 5.4 | CC: | atodorov, bburns, borgan, ddumas, rbalakri, sghosh |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2010-03-30 08:12:43 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Comment 1
Chris Lumens
2009-09-10 14:16:17 UTC
Modified in comps cvs. Please note the change will affects also translations: "Virtualization was translated, "Xen" is not.
Client x86_64 comps contains both KVM and Xen groups with correct names.
Client i386 comps contains only Xen group but the Virtualization category contains non existing kvm group:
<grouplist>
<groupid>kvm</groupid>
<groupid>xen</groupid>
</grouplist>
Server x86_64 comps contains both KVM and Xen groups with correct names.
Server i386, ia64 comps contains only Xen group but the Virtualization category contains non existing kvm group:
<grouplist>
<groupid>kvm</groupid>
<groupid>xen</groupid>
</grouplist>
This is for the 20100106.nightly trees. Installation not tested yet.
Xen is still the default group. Andrew, should KVM be the default ? No - Xen is the default for the RHEL5 lifecycle Client i386 installed successfully with virtualization selected. Anaconda UI was showing only the Xen group in Virtualization category. Moving to VERIFIED. An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2010-0207.html |