Bug 525159 - openvas-libraries are outdated
Summary: openvas-libraries are outdated
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: openvas-libraries
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 538035
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-09-23 14:57 UTC by Xavier Bachelot
Modified: 2009-12-02 05:31 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-12-02 05:31:20 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Xavier Bachelot 2009-09-23 14:57:21 UTC
openvas-libraries are outdated. The rawhide version is 1.0.2. latest version in the 1.x serie is 1.0.4. Latest version is 2.0.4.

On a side note, only the libraries are packaged, none of the other pieces of the software are available. Also cvs shows little activity (only automated bumps and rebuilds). Is there any plan to introduce the whole stack into Fedora ? Is there any plan to push it to the 2.x serie ?

Comment 1 Bug Zapper 2009-11-16 12:49:03 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 12 development cycle.
Changing version to '12'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 2 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-11-26 03:12:16 UTC
Hi Xavier, 
I will revamp the library and the rest of the stack soon.

Comment 3 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-11-26 03:59:07 UTC
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1831374

is now build, i am going to complete the openvas stack today.

Comment 4 Xavier Bachelot 2009-11-26 08:20:36 UTC
Hi Huzaifa,

Thanks a lot for the update. Please take a look at the dependency tree for this bug, another packager already submitted review requests for the missing pieces of the openvas stack. I'm adding him to the CC: of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=525159

Regards,
Xavier

Comment 5 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-11-26 08:29:50 UTC
Yes i realised that.
Stejpan,
Do you mind if i co-maintain your openvas stack?
I intended to do it a long time back, but got stuck with some other work.

Comment 6 Stjepan Gros 2009-11-27 15:24:02 UTC
No, I don't have anything against co-maintaining this package(s). Actually, I think it's better to have more maintainers, especially as openvas is an important application.

Comment 7 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-02 05:31:20 UTC
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-10474 is in rawhde now.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.