Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Tk-ObjScanner/perl-Tk-ObjScanner.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Tk-ObjScanner/perl-Tk-ObjScanner-2.012-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This perl module provides a GUI to scan the attributes of an object. It can also be used to scan the elements of a hash or an array.
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. The README says: This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. http://dev.perl.org/licenses/ So it's: GPLv2+ or Artistic MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
(In reply to comment #1) > > http://dev.perl.org/licenses/ > So it's: GPLv2+ or Artistic No. Perl is licensed under GPLv1 or later and the Artistic license. It should be "GPL+ or Artistic". See the perl packaging guidelines for details. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl > MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the > review. ??? You are doing the review, not me.
(In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > > > http://dev.perl.org/licenses/ > > So it's: GPLv2+ or Artistic > > No. Perl is licensed under GPLv1 or later and the Artistic license. > It should be "GPL+ or Artistic". See the perl packaging guidelines for details. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl > > > MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the > > review. > > ??? > You are doing the review, not me. My bad, i wasn't aware of the Packaging:Perl page (i should/will check about other pages as well) and i learned that the packager has to provide the rpmlint output as well. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
+ source files match upstream. 35702d85347357a2f9dad7284dc17ba1 Tk-ObjScanner-2.012.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license. GPL+ or Artistic + license is open source-compatible. + license text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1927836 + package installs properly. + rpmlint has no complaints: perl-Tk-ObjScanner.noarch: I: checking perl-Tk-ObjScanner.src: I: checking 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + final provides and requires are sane: perl(Tk::ObjScanner) = 2.12 perl-Tk-ObjScanner = 2.012-1.fc13 = perl >= 0:5.006 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) perl(Carp) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Tk::Derived) perl(Tk::Frame) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 + %check is present and all tests pass. tests are X-based (ughh!) so not run automatically + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED
(In reply to comment #4) > > APPROVED Thanks for the review, Ian! Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Tk-ObjScanner Short Description: Tk data scanner Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: perl-sig
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).
perl-Tk-ObjScanner-2.012-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Tk-ObjScanner-2.012-1.fc12
perl-Tk-ObjScanner-2.012-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Tk-ObjScanner-2.012-1.fc11
perl-Tk-ObjScanner-2.012-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Tk-ObjScanner'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-0835
perl-Tk-ObjScanner-2.012-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Tk-ObjScanner'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2010-0836
perl-Tk-ObjScanner-2.012-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
perl-Tk-ObjScanner-2.012-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.