Spec URL: http://pcfe.fedorapeople.org/netperf.spec SRPM URL: http://pcfe.fedorapeople.org/netperf-4.0.0-0.rc2.1.fc11.src.rpm Description: netperf4 being GPL2+ (as opposed to netperf2) and needing this for testing, I decided that I might as well package it up. But, I definitely would like some more eyeballs on the spec, especially W: configure-without-libdir-spec is that acceptable with this package? W: shared-lib-calls-exit ... are these acceptable considering the libraries are only used by netperf? 2 zero length documentation files should I exclude them from %doc (as I did with NEWS) or leave them in? Especially examples/TBD seems to be there explicitly to show more examples should be coming from upstream Is the breakup between netperf and netperf-devel OK? Plus anything else I may have missed.
was just made aware of iperf as that's in the repos pounding netperf4 into shape is probably a waste of time. closing this review request for now, will re-open if it turns out iperf is lacking features that netperf4 provides in a working form
new files uploaded: Spec URL: http://pcfe.fedorapeople.org/netperf.spec SRPM URL: http://pcfe.fedorapeople.org/netperf-4.0.0-0.rc2.3.el5.src.rpm but man and info pages have 0 length, so not really ready for inclusion