Description of problem: Could we get updates to 2.4.1 in F12 and maybe 2.9.0 in F13? I've got a 2.4.1 package ready to go. 2.9.0 still has compile errors (looks like it needs common-compress 1.0). I'm trying to package apache pdfbox, but it requires 2.4.1 to build.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1750630 I can check it in and build if that is okay.
Looks like gcj does not support Pattern.LITERAL, so 2.9.0 would have to drop gcj support at the moment. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1755404
Looks like 2.9.1 just got released. I'm happy to check in and build whatever versions seem appropriate.
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 12 development cycle. Changing version to '12'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
ping? please update!
I've updated rawhide to 2.4.1. If anything else needs updated or someone wants rawhide to go to 3.0.0, post the reasons here.
I just have one question: Why only rawhide?
I tend to be pretty conservative with updates to releases. Especially packages I don't own :-). If there is strong reasons to push to F12 (or even F11), I'm all ears. For the stuff I've been working on, there is still a lot more packaging work to be done, so rawhide is sufficient. Would be nice if Deepak could put in his opinion.
Please don't push new lucene version to released version unless you test that search in Eclipse Help Center is still working with the new lucene version.